Talk:Five Year Mission

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I have added many citations after doing extensive research. &mdash; GreenDayBeatles (talk) 00:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because . &mdash; 98.212.44.156 (talk) 01:26, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because they are an Indianapolis area Supergroup with many concerts, two produced CDs and 2000+ fans. They are an up and coming band that was 4th in line to play at the Superbowl. You should listen to them, search for "five year mission" on Youtube. &mdash; Echrisindy (talk) 01:33, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I am familiar with this band, through their music and Facebook, and agree that the information herein is accurate to the best of my knowledge. &mdash; 74.97.54.7 (talk) 01:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because . &mdash; 129.79.34.56 (talk) 01:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Does not qualify under WP:CSD
Not a speedy delete. The band has citations to online adjuncts of print publications (e.g., Nuvo, Wired) and has had a prominent role at a major event in their world (opened for William Shatner at Wizard World). Clearly this article could use some more references. Then we'd be in a much better position to tell whether it meets notability. But now or then, there is no way it doesn't pass the low bar of WP:CSD. Vadder (talk) 01:38, 29 February 2012 (UTC)