Talk:Five pounds (gold coin)

Modern commemoratives issued also in gold

 * 2013 Royal Christening

The commemoratives are 38.6mm diam whilst the £5 'sovereigns' are 36.02mm diam. - Rod57 (talk) 23:23, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 10 November 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerium (talk) 20:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Five pounds (British gold coin) → Five pounds (gold coin) – While various colonies still using the pound have issued commemorative five-pound gold coins, the British one is certainly the primary topic as having been issued for over 200 years. Note that there are no articles on non-British five-pound gold coins Wehwalt (talk) 14:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. EggRoll97 (talk) 15:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Brought here by the new article alerts template. Why is the Move request discussion needed; that is, is this a controversial move? And if so, where do I read about the controversy? Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  23:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I tend to be conservative on these, especially since I'm not British. This is one of three that I've proposed for moving, on Two pounds (British coin), other editors prefer a different title than I proposed. So I think the caution is justified. Wehwalt (talk) 23:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Got it, thx, will hold off then 'til I have time to read through and form an opinion. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  23:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Support in the absence of any reason not to. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  15:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.