Talk:Flaming Moe (cocktail)

Just added some references and more information. Should remove "does not adequately cite references"?Gekritzl 23:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Urban dictionary doesn't really count as a reputable source. Similarly, the search.com citation is a wikiclone, and lacks references itself. I've removed the references for the time being - Tiswas (t/c) 22:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Curious about the reason the double-entendre information was deleted.Gekritzl 23:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The source is a wikiclone (c.f. WP:RS) - Whether it is true or not, it is still sbject to WP:A - Tiswas (t/c) 00:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Reference to the Wiki page on this Simpsons episode should be adequate reference. Gekritzl 23:08, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding "Notability brought into question" - this beverage article needs its own page because it is part of Wiki's list of Fictional beverages "Category:Fictional beverages"   Gekritzl 23:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Moreover, deleting the article is in opposition to Wikipedia philosophy and goal. Wiki's goal: "The main goal of this project is to ensure that Wikipedia has a corresponding article for every article in every other general purpose encyclopedia available...". See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles. Wikipedia policy also says: Notable is defined as "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice"; it is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance".Gekritzl 00:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)