Talk:Flavigny-sur-Ozerain

Present canonical status of the SSPX
Please do not claim that the SSPX is "schismatic". This is incorrect. Even the Vatican does not claim that.

Elaineseery (talk) 10:03, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I think it is a bit much to describe the SSPX as "a traditionalist wing of the Roman Catholic Church" - it has no canonical status within the Church as referenced on the main SSPX page Mark.hamid (talk) 14:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Flavigny-sur-Ozerain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071124142010/http://www.insee.fr/en/home/home_page.asp to http://www.insee.fr/en/home/home_page.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)