Talk:Fleet management software

listing sample systems vs denigration as promotional link
I listed Sofico Miles as a sample fleet management software system, but User:Kuru found it necessary to call it promotional and to remove it. I would personally very welcome it to see more systems listed and described here. I am personally not affiliated with Sofico, and I don't have any financial benefit from listing it here, I just find it useful to see contemporary software listed here. Any (dis)agreement? --johayek (talk) 12:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * http://www.sofico.be/solutions/markets/fleet-management
 * Obviously there is disagreement. There is no need to start a random directory of promotional external links, see WP:LINKFARM. You're also not being transparent with your conflict of interest. Kuru   (talk)  12:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You appear to me as verbally violent. Are you able to use less aggressive language? Thanks!
 * I don't have any such conflict of interest, as falsely claimed by you. In my professional life as an IT freelancer I came across a project, where Sofico Miles was to be implemented for a customer in the financial industry.
 * I got curious to familiarize with the topic in a more general way. I looked for the article dealing with the topic. By my impression this would be the right article, but the existing systems do neither get named nor described.
 * It makes sense to add examples from the industry to this article, doesn't it? It's only about making this article more helpful and more valuable to its readers.
 * I must agree, I don't have any overview about the respective industry. But it helps to add details – little by little. Others will add their details. And we all togehter will keep the article in shape.
 * Can't we add a sentence naming a couple of known systems, maybe without links, so that they won't get denigrated again as promotional?--johayek (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll keep the "verbal violence" to a minimum: "no". Kuru   (talk)  11:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC)