Talk:Flekkefjord Station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * Starting GAreview.Pyrotec (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Initial questions

 * Paul Armin Due - "The station building was drawn by...", I think in English a better word would be "The station building was designed by...", is this the intended meaning?
 * Yes, that would be the intention. I am sorry, another Norwengish term (in Norwegian, architects draw houses, and my dictionary did not mention the term). Thankfully, there are people who can find my systematical errors and teach me how to become a better writer.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

A Good Article. Congratulations, I'm awarding GA status.Pyrotec (talk) 22:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for another review. Arsenikk (talk)  23:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)