Talk:Fleming, Georgia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: FormalDude (talk · contribs) 07:44, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

I will post updates here as I complete the review. –– FormalDude  talk  07:44, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Failed "good article" nomination
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of January 10, 2022, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: ✅ Prose, spelling, and grammar all fine.
 * 2. Verifiable?: ✅ It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: ❌ Fails to cover major aspects of the topic. Missing content on government, geography, infrastructure, culture, landmarks/places, people, and economy.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: ❌ Fair representation without bias is not achievable as major content missing.
 * 5. Stable?: ✅ No edit wars, etc.
 * 6. Images?: ❌ It is not illustrated by images and other media where possible and appropriate.

Overall: ❌ Article needs significant expansion to meet good criteria.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far. –– FormalDude  talk  08:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Huh? There are a lot of things that are left out of RS for this community or hard to find online, unfortunately, and I understand that. I thought there was also a grace period to fix problems (ex. 24 hours)? As someone going through this process for the first time I am verrrry confused.  wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  09:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hold is optional, normally reserved for cases where the problems are quickly resolvable. I don't believe this article problem's are quickly resolvable, as it needs significant expansion in multiple areas, which can take some time. –– FormalDude  talk  09:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)