Talk:Floatplane

Please fix svwp
The Swedish version of this article sv:Pontonflygplan has no links to the other languages as this English article. Can someone please go to svwp and fix links to the other language-versions. I want to do it, but can't because I'm just now blocked due to a conflict. Best regards BjörnBergman 16:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)


 * It's fixed! :) 81.229.81.120 (talk) 14:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Floatplane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071124055039/http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero/aircraft/aradoar.htm to http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero/aircraft/aradoar.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Single float advantage
Many years ago an aviation publication (Air Classics?) stated that the US Navy considered a single float superior because it eliminated the problem of an asymmetric imbalance of the aircraft should one watertight compartment be flooded. I cannot now find the RS to cite, but this fact needs to be recorded on Wikipedia so that it doesn't die with me. Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 18:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)