Talk:Florence Brudenell-Bruce

prince harry
prince harry must be talk as she went on tatler cover tatler about it and jessen buttons to or deleted article.

'''==model== some of her work like model and face of compaines aren't written down should be mentioned like she did a little catwalk show etc... done of it is written down and also the libel thing i thing some has been delete and part of POV when it has no reason not to be there.

pov
must add private life as it partly reason for adding not adding private life on this article but on others is unfair her press coverage is not justifed but her work — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.51.238 (talk) 14:57, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

appears to be written like an advertisement
yea can't say it does not to talk about here article with tatler magazine with harrys girl or this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwOk5xKKAkM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgdCRKCeFbE&feature=endscreen&NR=1 or god forbid the interview with the sun or daily mail long ago which she has tryed to cover up sad http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2042924/Florence-Brudenell-Bruce-delves-Freud--short-mohair-dress--flirty-fashion-shoot.html should talk about that then this http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2068109/Prince-Harrys-ex-Florence-Brudenell-Bruce-looks-stunning-cover-Tatler.html bad publist — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.51.238 (talk) 07:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

dress size
uk size 4 is not the same as us size 4 uk size 4 is us size 0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pennyann89 (talk • contribs) 23:04, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Unexplained removal of what appears to be sourced material
I am going to revert unexplained removal of sourced material. The removal appears strange in the context of ongoing AfD. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 22:52, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Just because it's "sourced" doesn't mean it's appropriate for Wikipedia. =//= Johnny Squeaky 01:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

funny how this wasnt here before harry then no as her carrer before jenson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.51.238 (talk) 00:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I just think that tabloid fluff like some "actresses" bra cup size or the fact that her farts are tapped to make expensive perfume are just not where Wikipedia should go, and that's where this article was going. It was clearly a PR job by her flacks for the purpose of the TMZ crowd, Can't we expect better here? =//= Johnny Squeaky 18:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Bollywood?
The article says (referenced to a short line in Vogue) that she was a Bollywood "actress". Is there any more substantial proof? IMDB shows w films, not Bollywood... =//= Johnny Squeaky 18:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)