Talk:Flower Lane Church

Copyright Violation
I have compared the article and the supposed source, and I am bewildered as to how anyone can think this is a copyvio. Can either MLauba or someone else explain? JamesBWatson (talk) 00:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * While the virtual ink is spilling all over the place now, here are my concerns:


 * Source:


 * Article - word for word copy bolded, close paraphrase italics


 * In addition to that, the structure of our article follows the source extremely closely.


 * The real problem here is that while the main article contributor has made several good efforts to paraphrase, we're looking at a copy / paste which was subsequently modified. The result is still very recognizable. The safest way would be to forget that there is a copy / paste function available in the first place and just write in a totally independent manner. Is it easy to do? Not with one single source, I agree. Still, it is unfortunately the only safe way.


 * Hope this clarifies my worries here. Best, MLauba (talk) 08:23, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, that is much clearer. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:16, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. -- — Cactus Writer |   needles  20:41, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flower Lane Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716101542/http://www1.chinaculture.org/library/2008-02/04/content_25594.htm to http://www.chinaculture.org/library/2008-02/04/content_25594.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)