Talk:Floyd Trevis

Requested move 1 May 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus found that there is no primary topic. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

– The car constructor seems to be of fleeting importance, and I therefore see no claim to it being the primary topic of the term. BD2412 T 19:29, 1 May 2022 (UTC) — Relisting.  ああ、またか.  晚安.  11:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Trevis → Trevis (constructor)
 * Trevis (disambiguation) → Trevis
 * Support as per nom. 162 etc. (talk) 20:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. No clear primary topic. Paintspot Infez (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose Literally nothing to disambiguate with, per WP:NAMELIST, there are no extremely notable "Trevis"'s. If the page is deleted for non-notability, then I'd support the disambiguation being moved there - otherwise, no. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:19, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The car constructor literally gets less than 1% of the hits all possible senses. It shouldn't need to be deleted to be discounted. The surname as a surname is more notable. BD2412  T 23:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Except there is no specific page for the surname. With nothing to disambiguate that is a believable competing primary topic I do not see the necessity to move. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Support, although this should be turned into a true DAB and a separate page made for the name/surname.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I would not object to that in principle. I think that we usually have combination given name/surname pages where the names have the same origin, which I doubt is the case here, but there are not enough people with just the given name or just the surname to have different pages for each of those instances. BD2412  T 02:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Support per nomination, 162 etc. and Paintspot Infez. The two-sentence stub delineating the racing car constructor from 70 years ago is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 18:00, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment/oppose for now - I'm not overly knowledgeable of the specific subject area (1950s American open-wheel car racing) or the sources surrounding it, but I suspect the sources surrounding this subject are far more likely to be offline (and most likely far easier to access to those in the US), but without someone knowledgeable going through sources I'm reticent to comment on the notability of this subject (which may be greater than it appears today per WP:NOTTEMPORARY). However, based upon previous decisions regarding articles like Gordon Schroeder I do wonder if it would be better to move this article to a title like Floyd Trevis, although such a decision would require said sourcing to be found in order to establish further information. If this article were moved then moving the disambiguation page to the base title would make a lot more sense, but currently the constructor is the only article at that exact title. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 22:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Support no PT. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Support. No primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)