Talk:Fluor Corporation/Archive 1

It's a copy of their about page
See http://www.fluor.com/about/default.asp (accessed 23 March 2007).

Definitely not neutral in its content either.

Corp?
Why was this moved from Fluor to Fluor Corp. ? Articles on other corporations don't have "Corp." in their name. See: Microsoft, Dell, Johnson and Johnson, Jacobs Engineering Group. Actually, I can't find one other company with "Corp." in their article name. Harksaw 15:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC) Never mind. Naming_conventions Harksaw 15:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Still, why "Corp." rather than "Corporation"? —Tamfang (talk) 17:15, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, use "Corporation" instead of Corp." much formal and appropriate —Thinkbeforeyoupost

14:13, 10 May 2011 (GMT)
 * Initiate a page move discussion here and, if nobody object, move it in due time. If there is objections, you might have to go through the proper motions. Calistemon (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:20, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Fluor Corp. → Fluor Corporation – To give this company an appropriate name that is not conflicting with the name of the mineral fluor and fluoride. . Mksolmoro (talk) 18:43, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Support: Seems the right name to me. Calistemon (talk) 19:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Support: thanks mksolmoro for the motion. Google search suggests "Fluor" alone or "Fluor Corporation." Search result "Fluor Corp." was only from wikipedia. Thinkbeforeyoupost
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fair use rationale for Image:Fluor-logo.jpg
Image:Fluor-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)