Talk:Fly Me to the Moon (2024 film)

Requested move 23 December 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move (closed by non-admin page mover) Warm Regards,  ZI Jony  (Talk) 11:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Project Artemis (film) → Untitled Greg Berlanti project – The film was originally titled Project Artemis, but is now untitled. The Media Expert (talk) 20:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 12:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Remember there's no requirement to have a move discussion before every article move, this could've probably been moved right away, and a discussion had only if contested afterwards. —El Millo (talk) 05:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Against. Who on earth is going to search for Untitled Greg Berlanti project? Project Artemis (film) is a good name for the article until the movie is officially renamed. 165.140.231.97 (talk) 05:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Against. I'm going to be against on this, the project was long under the title of Project Artemis. I don't see a need to make a retitling until we have the actual new title in hand. Rusted AutoParts  06:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Against. As far as I know, media outlets, among other sources, reporting on this change have been (directly or indirectly) referring to the project as Untitled Scarlett Johansson/Channing Tatum film instead. Even that seems like a lot of words, and also keeping in mind that the title Project Artemis has been used for a relatively long time, I feel it's better to keep the current title until a new one is announced. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (Converse here) 04:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

cookies
I followed the `Official website` link. The page only had a single image for the trailer. When I clicked on it, it said "TO VIEW VIDEOS ON THIS SITE, YOU NEED TO ENABLE CERTAIN COOKIES." I enabled every cookie except "Targeting cookies" and it still refused. I'm not going to give them permission to spam me just to see one ad. Should we add a disclaimer in the article about this?  Stepho  talk 23:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Just delete the cookies after you watch the trailer. Is that so hard? (FYI, that's a rhetorical question, and the answer is no -- I clear my cookies daily). Gato63 (talk) 04:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure, I can do that. Or start the browser in incognito mode. Or spin up burner VM. Or 20 other ways. Just infuriating that they make us go through extra steps in order to see their ad. And the average viewer doesn't know how to do any of those things. I watched the trailer on the IMDB link instead.  Stepho  talk 04:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

‘operation avalanche’
Should there be mention of matt johnson's 2016 film Operation Avalanche (film) given the similarities of the plots, and the initial working title of project artemis? Joopfoop (talk) 09:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC)