Talk:Flyers–Penguins rivalry

Incredibly biased
This was obviously written by a Flyers fan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.123.151.228 (talk) 20:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah this pretty biased to say the least 108.17.94.14 (talk) 06:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * What in particular do you think is biased? --Izzygood (talk) 07:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

2010 season
The information about the Flyers winning their second round playoff series during their Cinderella march to the 2010 Stanley Cup Finals is relevant information. The Penguins being eliminated in their second round series in the 2010 Stanley Cup playoffs is also relevant info. Both are not redundant. The only reason why I want to keep this information in is because the Flyers didn't have to worry about facing the Penguins in the playoffs and it made their run to the Finals much easier. – SNIyer12, (talk), 15:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)


 * That is an incredibly ridiculous statement, hence why I kept removing that text. You have no way of justifying that statement, nor does the outcome of the 2010 playoffs factor into the rivalry simply because the teams did not play each other. Darthflyer (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

article name change
Why was this article's name changed with no prior discussion? I feel it should be changed back to Battle of Pennsylvania, or at least discussed first. ChakaKongtalk 16:46, 22 September 2012 (UTC)