Talk:Foam pump

John Frieda
A John Frieda FAQ is not a reliable source for claims about the Disadvantages of a Foam Pump or The fields of application (?). Also, the added content misrepresents the source, violates WP:OR and is written somewhat incoherently. - MrX 22:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

There are disadvantages to a foamer. I asked you to talk please before undoing. you undid. This article is up for deletion and I am trying to improve it.Please do not blank the section again-if you want to fix it go ahead.24.0.133.234 (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Please read what I wrote above. Please use reliable sources (see WP:RS). Improperly cited material may be challenge and removed by any editor. Please do not continue to insert original research in violation of Wikipedia's policies. - MrX 22:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

You are all-over the place here. Was it really necessary to re-add the spelling errors, and delete the reflist? Besides blanking the section disadvantages of foamer pump? It says right in the preceding paragraph that LESS of a product is used. The cost of the pump makes the cost of the product higher even though there is less product being purchased and used. Believe me MrX I will hunt-down solid-gold references for this, as i said on my IP talk page it is on24.0.133.234 (talk) 22:55, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Obviously, I didn't intend to damage the article. In any case, I'm glad to hear that you will channel your energies toward finding good sources. I couldn't find any, but if you do, perhaps this article can be saved. - MrX 23:06, 21 November 2013 (UTC)


 * OK, I will keep working on it. You were right in the first place, the article was a mess, but yes these foam dispensers are here and it serves WP and it's readers to have an article. IF we can find the correct name for these things. Also-there is a lot of confusion about the foamers. But these are the non-aerosol ones. And in further research, it appears to me-because many early suppliers are out of business and dead web-sites etc. That there could be a patent problem involved, or maybe they just didn't work very well? 24.0.133.234 (talk) 01:27, 22 November 2013 (UTC)