Talk:Focke-Wulf Fw 200 Condor

Finger trouble? Citation?
The following two entries are mutually inconsistent, and I don't think that the associated ref is correctly stated: On 11 October 1944, Luftwaffe Fw 200C-4 (radio code F8+ES, Work Number 0163) of 8./KG 40 crashed at Kvanntoneset, Norway due to tail separation while flying over Lavanger fjord, killing all 51 on board.

On 21 April 1945, a Deutsche Lufthansa Fw 200KB-1 (D-ASHH, Hessen) crashed near Piesenkofen, Germany, killing all 21 on board. This crash is the deadliest accident involving the Fw 200.

In particular, is the 51 figure correct?JonRichfield (talk) 16:26, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Seems to be, I found it in 2 different, reasonably accurate places.&#32;- NiD.29 (talk) 07:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1978-043-02, Focke-Wulf Fw 200 C Condor.jpg

Cruise altitude
Something is wrong here: "To fly long distances economically, the Fw 200 was designed to cruise at an altitude of over 3,000 m (9,800 ft) - as high as possible without a pressurized cabin. Existing airliners were designed to cruise at altitudes below 1,500 m (5,000 ft)." 10,000 ft was not "high altitude," even in the 1930s (even First World War biplanes routinely went to 20,000 ft or higher); it's just the limit for passenger comfort in an unpressurized plane. 10,000 ft was well within the capabilities of a DC-2 or DC-3 as well. If the DC-2 and DC-3 had always cruised below 5,000 ft, they wouldn't even have been able to overfly the Appalachians in the eastern US, much less any serious terrain. David (talk)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * PP-CBJ.jpg