Talk:Foie gras/archivelist


 * Archive 1 contains the following sections: Bans, Health benefits, Consumption, Cruelty, Ban on consumption?, POV, May 8, 2005 edits by 24.127.99.9, Reversion, Proper attribution, Sterile Ducks?, Man, this stuff is good!, Critical response to Michael Ginor, Unclear passage in Criticism section, gag reflex, pronunciation check, Production methods, "Foie gras" and not "Paté de foie gras", Article removed from Wikipedia:Good articles, medcabal, medcabal round two, Does the implication that "Animal Rights Activists" are the only objectors meet NPOV?, Removed statement on duck migration that was not found in the listed source, Inline citations needed


 * Archive 2 contains the following sections: Bloated Controversy section, Recent removal, NPOV, Protected, Clearly POV reverts, Tokaji, Still no answer,    Unprotection requested, Ad hominem arguments are no arguments, Discussion of specific editing issues, Proposal, RFC, Unlock time?, Criticism, "Is" a delicacy?, Overfed / force-fed


 * Archive 3 contains the following sections: Regarding references, Stopgavage / "the Proclamation for the Abolition of the Gavage", Chicago "considering overturning the ban", Prominence of the controversy, Argentina, "Most of those countries never produced foie gras to start with", New changes, Conflicting sources re: gag reflex, Sources, Addition of summary-style section to the EU report section, Removed "good article" template, Trimming external links, WP is not for advertisement, Introduction, TotallyDisputed tag added, Am I the only one..., Just for the record, Trying to get beyond the bickering, Mediation, GA template, Translation of gavage, RFC for factual accuracy dispute, Sources again, GA Status under review, Image, That "in the first place" stuff, Public opinion in the US, Section: Controversy, Section: Controversy II (arbitrary section break), Polls, Mediation Cabal has picked up the case, Recent AP release about Chicago