Talk:Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence

Ten years in summary
A revision on of 18:11, 4 December 2012 added "They are back home after 10 years" to the summary. Worded this way, the meaning wasn't clear. It could mean it took 10 years for them to walk back home or it could simply mean they were back home 10 years later. If the latter, it might be equally valid to say they were back home 9 years later, or 12 years later. The former is clearly wrong. Subsequent edits changed it to "They back home 10 after 10 years" and "They got back home after 10 years." I removed the line. Note that the reference to the Matheo article in the Telegraph was there before the line in question was added. SlowJog (talk) 07:19, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Misrepresentation of the book
The point is that the book tells a completely different story from the film. It explains the very valid reasons for the children's removal. No cages. Good treatment.

Completely missing from this. Tuntable (talk) 00:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)