Talk:Foo Fighters (album)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Noleander (talk · contribs) 12:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I can do this review, pending consent of nominator. --Noleander (talk) 12:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments
--Noleander (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * word "frontman" - may need explanation for readers not familiar with the term.
 * "The album did receive minor criticism .." -> "The album received ..."
 * Foo Fighters navbox at bottom of article: is there a way to have it expanded (not collapsed) by default, so novice readers can see the whole thing without clicking?
 * "... but once Petty heard about the Foo Fighters, he instead stimulated Grohl to move on with this solo project." - "Stimulated" is not the right word. Maybe  "encouraged"
 * "at Capitol's insistence photos of the entire lineup .." - what lineup? the producers?  Or the band that Grohl assembled after the album was finished?

Fixed those (except the template, there's a way to do it but I don't know if it's required...). igordebraga ≠ 01:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

More comments

 * Very good. I am passing this. A couple of afterthoughts:
 * There is no "See also" section: are there no related articles that are not yet linked? If not, no need for such  section.
 * There is no "references/bibliography" section that list books on the topic. Are there any books that focus the band?  If not, no need for such  section. --Noleander (talk) 13:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Tick list
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

--Noleander (talk) 13:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail: