Talk:Foo was here

Reversion of the unjustified merger with "Kilroy was here".
I have reverted the merger with the Kilroy was here article. Firstly, I don't find it at all acceptable that this merger was made without any proposal and discussion. Secondly, the aFoo rticle is part of the Australian Wikipedia project - and, thirdly, it is believed in Australia that "Foo was here" originates before "Kilroy was here" and is not, therefore, a so-called "variation" of it but that "Kilroy was here" derives from "Foo".. Therefore the whole basis of the merger is false. How would an American like it if I merged "Kilroy was here" with the "Foo" article? Not very much I suspect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afterwriting (talk • contribs)


 * Merge discussion is here. Fences  &amp;  Windows  19:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 15:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)