Talk:Fool in Love (Rihanna song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 01:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi again! Finishing one review, and starting another. I'll be reviewing it by Sunday. As i know how good the contributor is at writing articles (having only minor issues sometimes), i think i can finish it by Sunday (of course, i don't know). --Hahc21 (talk) 01:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol thanks. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 01:09, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Round 1
Overall analysis:The article seems to be in good shape. It meets the structure guidelines and the notability guideline for songs, which is mandatory for a song article. On a first look, the references seem to be well-structured and written in accordance with the criteria and are well placed inside the text. The infobox contains all the necessary information, the music sample is well done and meets the criteria of 30 seconds. The whole article is not overwikilinked and the text is fluent, unbiased and with a readable prose.

One concern: I think the lead section should be split into 2 paragraphs instead of just one. it's only a recommendation, but it's not mandatory. Just for stylistic purposes. Also, i think the number of downloads should be left outside the lead, it is too detailed for it, i think. By now, everything seems ok. I'll be checking the prose in detail at first. --Hahc21 (talk) 19:02, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

I have no prose comments by now. Everything seems to be well written. I'll be checking then the sources. --Hahc21 (talk) 19:02, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Prose comments


 * Sources
 * We have a contradiction between ref #1 and ref #7: reference No.1 says the lyrics as "He's my biggest man", while references #7 says "he's my biggest fan". So, which one is wactually sang by Rihanna?
 * It's "fan". "man" is just a misheard typo by the reviewer I think. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One
 * We have a problem with reference No.3 on this statement: "St Asaph also compared the song's composition to Britney Spears' "Criminal" (Femme Fatale, 2011), with regard to how "Fool in Love"'s instrumental begins with "panning synths" and acoustic guitar."
 * When the reader looks at the reference, i suppose it should read St Asaph on reference No.1. I also suppose reference No.3 is supporting the fact that "Fool in Love" is similar to Brits "Criminal", isn't it? Amy Sciaretto is the author of the article (reference No.3) but she is not mentioned anywhere, so i recommend to rewrite the sentence to properly cover the info supported by Ref. No.3.
 * As an example, it could be like this: "Amy Sciaretto from PopCrush, as well as St Asaph, compared the song's composition to Britney Spears' "Criminal" (Femme Fatale, 2011), with regard to how "Fool in Love"'s instrumental begins with "panning synths" and acoustic guitar, with Sciaretto agreeing that "only Ri[hanna] could make that juxtaposition work."" --Hahc21 (talk) 19:14, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Have done. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One


 * Reference No.6 is dead. of course this can be fixed later, but i'll check the website to see if i find a new link.
 * I've scanned the entire website and only found this:
 * "Review: Rihanna's Talk That Talk". By T'CHA DUNLEVY, The Gazette.
 * Added Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 15:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC).

Now i'll wait for Calvin to see what he thinks, and then follow with the verdict. --Hahc21 (talk) 22:48, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Final coment
 * Thanks. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 15:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Verdict
Ok, everything have been addressed, so, i'll give my verdict:
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Final comments: Well done. Minor issues arose but were finally fixed. Congrats to the main collaborator for his work. Nothing else to be noted. There is not much information to be added and i don't think it'll be released as a single, so it's complete.
 * Thanks. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One