Talk:For the Glory

WP:VG assessment
Good work! Definitely a C-class article now. Usually when I post an assessment I give a mini-review of the article with some points for improvement, but all I can really say with this article is that you just need to keep expanding in each area where appropriate.

The gameplay section looks pretty much finished, although I'd suggest mentioning the setting of the game here (basic rule is any info in the lead section should be somewhere else in the article). If the game's appearance is radically different from that in the preview image I'd suggest getting a new screenshot. I'd also suggest trimming some of the sentences of excessive words, e.g. However, multiplayer stability issues, laborious management, and irritating sound effects soured opinions. can just be The game was criticized for its multiplayer stability issues, laborious management, and irritating sound effects; For example, the previously mentioned AGCEEP modification doesn't need the "For example".

Otherwise, look at other featured/good video game articles (bottom of WP:VG) to get an idea of what to do. If you have any questions, go ahead and ask. Hope this helps, Una LagunaTalk 10:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on For the Glory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100205075155/http://www.gamersdailynews.com/article-2314-For-the-Glory-Review-PC.html to http://www.gamersdailynews.com/article-2314-For-the-Glory-Review-PC.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)