Talk:Foramen spinosum/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sahara4u (talk · contribs) 03:27, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments
 * ✅ Lead section may be expanded a little. Usually, a paragraph of more than three line ts recommended, merge the two para.
 * Fleshed out.--LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * ❌ History section should come before Structure.
 * Thanks, the relevant guideline for this article is WP:MEDMOS. For Anatomy articles and medicine-related articles in general, history is recommended as coming after structure.--LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * ✅ Images need alt text.
 * Thanks for pointing this out, alternate text is a great way to make articles more accessible that I previously wasn't aware of. I'm not sure if my browser is able to view them, so if I haven't done it correctly please let me know.--LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * ✅ Place "Additional images" before References
 * Done, and removed one image. --LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

—Zia Khan 03:34, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comments and taking up this review, I hope we can work together to get this promoted. --LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for taking up this review,, I feel I have addressed your concerns. Do you have any additional concerns regarding promotion to GA status? LT910001 (talk) 12:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Assessment

 * GA review (see Good article criteria and WP:GACN)


 * 1) Well-written.
 * a (clear and concise prose which doesn't violate copyright laws, grammar and spelling are correct): b ''(MoS for lead, layout, word choice, and fiction:
 * 1) Factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (well referenced): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (No original research):
 * 1) Broad in its coverage.
 * a (covers major aspects): b (well focused):
 * 1) Neutral .
 * Fair representation, no bias:
 * 1) Stable.
 * No edit wars nor disputed contents:
 * 1) Illustrated appropriately by images.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Conclusion: Good work with the article. Keep it up! —Zia Khan 23:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Illustrated appropriately by images.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Conclusion: Good work with the article. Keep it up! —Zia Khan 23:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Conclusion: Good work with the article. Keep it up! —Zia Khan 23:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail: