Talk:Ford Super Duty/Archive 1

pricing
Do we really need the pricing for the different trim levels and options for these trucks listed in this article? It reads more like a sales brochure then an encyclpedia

Answer - Yes, this seems like a relevant addition in order to document the cost of the vehicle at the time it was sold (not adjusted for inflation) so as to provide for future comparisons of vehicle pricing. For instance, if you could see that the cost of the same model was increasing by 6% a year over a given period, but during that same period inflation rose at only 3% one could surmise that the real cost of the vehicle increased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.235.36.246 (talk) 04:31, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Manual Transmission
The article lists the manual transmission in 05+ trucks as being the M6OD. This is incorrect. This is a Mazda transmission that Ford DOES use in lighter applications. However, in the Super Duty, there is a ZF S6-650 made by ZF Friedrichshafen AG. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89firebird2.8 (talk • contribs) 21:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Third generation (2008-present)
I tagged this section for cleanup because I didn't know quite where to start. There is all sorts of bad writing style, e.g. "Another notable feature is" and "Some unique points to highlight" (which continues in a way which I can't figure out). There is some useful information in this section, but some features can be summarized, and paragraphs can be combined. --Vossanova o&lt; 18:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision
This needs to be revised. It is horrible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeepcomanche1 (talk • contribs) 02:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm working on it. It's gonna take a few years by the way it looks. What's the reason for what seems to be dozens of pictures? --Dana60Cummins (talk) 19:59, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

F-450 & F-550 Myths
Despite a really odd rumor/myth floating around. F-450 and F-550 model Super Duty's are not the same.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 19:59, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Overhauls needed
05-07 Facelift and 2nd Gen sections still need tons of work —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dana60Cummins (talk • contribs) 21:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Too many pictures
Are these pictures necessary? So many 1st Gen pictures that it's flooding into the 2nd Gen area. Then causing the 2nd Gen pictures to flood past the references..... I think some of them need cleaned out. Seems redundant as well. --Dana60Cummins (talk) 19:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)