Talk:Ford Zetec engine

Untitled
The reference isn't wrong. A FOE engineer even came forward, anonymously of course, some time ago with details of the Rocam program only an insider would know...including the fact that Rocam is based on Kent. (many of the items he gave to indicate a Kent basis were genuinely just common sense things we should have recognized anyway) Unfortunately this isn't supposed to be enough for Wiki inclusion for obvious reasons, fortunately we have no credible original source stating that this is Zetec or Sigma based either so it apparently has slid by the watchdogs likely because it hasn't been challenged much. (my hat is off to the fella smart enough to include it in the first place) So please, don't rock the boat. This is one of the few automotive issues on Wikipedia which isn't so inaccurate it's laughable. Syr74 (talk) 14:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

I think the bit about the Zetec-Rocam is wrong. Every other page says it's based on the Zetec-SE or Sigma engine, not the Kent/Endura-E. --22:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Zetec RoCam merge
These sections of the Ford Kent and Ford Zetec articles are almost identical, so should be merged into one:

Ford_Kent_engine

Ford_Zetec_engine

Does this need a vote? John a s (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ford Zetec engine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120920001630/http://mechdb.com/index.php/Ford_Zetec_engines to http://mechdb.com/index.php/Ford_Zetec_engines
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080915162411/http://www.rs-mania.co.uk/ to http://www.rs-mania.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)