Talk:Foreign policy/Archive 1

Untitled
reof a particular state, are about the relations (not about the policy of one particular state thus, but about the interaction between all states). Moreover IR theory can and does include non-state actors. I therefore think that a reference to IR theory is appropriate on this page, as widely as it is done now. Therefore I suggest to remove of at least significantly shorten the IR theory section. Sijo Ripa 13:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)bitch


 * Perhaps the word "Theory" couldjjfddfgWhat is the random box with "Yeaah" in it? someone get rid of it! I would, but I don't know what is supposed to go in there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CrazyOmega (talk • contribs) 15:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

The first sentence reeks of rational choice theory. States might act in non self-interested ways - consider overseas aid and humanitarian intervention. Should be changed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.221.4.56 (talk) 00:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Can someone redirect the link to Hume?
It is leading the reader to the article of King David for some weird reason.

--159.81.75.58 (talk) 08:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

THIS ARTICLE IS SHITTY!!! NEEDS URGENT REVISION!

War hawk
You are invited to participate in Talk:War hawk about whether War hawk should be moved to Hawk (foreign policy). The discussion could be closed as early as today. Sorry for the late notice. R2 (bleep) 18:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)