Talk:Foreland Fields

Untitled
This article is a little misleading and most of the information actually seems to be about Bembridge as a whole. Unless it is reworked so that that the information actually refers to the subject, it might be at the wrong end of a merge proposal... --Peeky44 (talk) 00:58, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Agreed - along with Lane End--Streona (talk) 12:37, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Merger proposal
I propose that Foreland Fields be merged into Foreland. I think that the content in the Foreland Fields article can easily be explained in the context of Foreland, and the Foreland article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Foo will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. &mdash; Rod talk 19:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Agreed and ✅ Klbrain (talk) 14:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)