Talk:Forest Highway 16/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Titoxd (talk · contribs) 22:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * The prose is excellent for the most part, although some parts could still be tightened up a bit. Specific comments:
 * The three counties in question do not participate in the system, and the roadway falls in the middle of the G zone for numbering purposes. — it would be ideal if you could mention the counties that Hwy 16 runs through before this sentence. Also, if you could explain what the G zone is (e.g. "The "G" Zone is west of US 41 between Lake Michigan and Lake Superior," from List of Michigan County-Designated Highways) that would also aid the lay reader in understanding where the route lies.
 * FFH 16 crosses back into Houghton County one last time and immediately terminates at M-38 west of the community of Nisula.[2][3] — since there is no map, is M-38 just the terminus of Hwy 16, or does M-28 terminate there as well?
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * No issues here.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * The article really needs a map (and WP:USRD/STDS even demands one), but WP:WIAGA does not mandate this.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * The only real complaint I have with the article is that there is no map, but I understand that map making isn't a trivial task, and thus won't put a hold on the article for that. Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 23:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * The article really needs a map (and WP:USRD/STDS even demands one), but WP:WIAGA does not mandate this.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * The only real complaint I have with the article is that there is no map, but I understand that map making isn't a trivial task, and thus won't put a hold on the article for that. Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 23:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The only real complaint I have with the article is that there is no map, but I understand that map making isn't a trivial task, and thus won't put a hold on the article for that. Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 23:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)