Talk:Forgive Me If I've Told You This Before

I thought the lead section of the article was very detailed and provided a good insight into the creation of the book. I thought the article’s structure was very clear and easy to read through and find the proper information that was needed. I thought the content covered many areas of this topic and does its job very well.
 * Agreed. I think the plot section could use some re-writing.  I'm also wondering if Triinu's "newfound appreciation towards women" is an euphemism, and could be clearer?  -- Sandbergja (talk) 04:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

The article itself was very detailed and specific. the summary left no questions. I would have been less confused if there was a subheading about measure 9, or just a link to something to explain? other than that, it was detailed and held more information on important subjects. Green dragon cries (talk) 16:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Green dragon cries

I thought the lead section of the article was clear, easy to understand, and detailed. The article's structure made sense for was it was about, and was pretty straightforward. I also thought the article also cited as many reliable sources as possible, given the nature of the article. Calmbeav (talk) 23:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)