Talk:Forglen House/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 20:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Will review within next three days.♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Lead
 * "Aberdeen City Architect" - why is architect capitalised?
 * "Aberdeen City Architect" was his job title rather than his being an architect in Aberdeen City.


 * History
 * Link Panmure, Panmure House?
 * Malcolm of Monymusk - I think you can remove "of Monymusk" because it is mentioned earlier
 * Link Inverurie?
 * linked and added "just north of" so there isn't a sea of blue links.


 * "appears to remain" - "appears to have remained"
 * " As Alexander's eldest son, also Alexander," -As Alexander's eldest son, also named Alexander,
 * "Development of the estate policies[c] started by the Ogilvys was continued and the grandeur further enhanced when Sir Robert Abercromby, 5th Baronet, Lady Jane Abercromby's son, commissioned the building of the new mansion as its centrepiece, which was complemented by several other buildings.[6]" A bit of a mouthful, can you reword/rephrase?
 * Delink Germany


 * Mansion
 * Delink River Deveron and Sir Robert Abercromby per OVERLINK
 * Aberdeen City Architect -ditto
 * Link canted, gables and flues for the architecturally retarded folk..


 * Gardens
 * "In 1906 some excavation work was undertaken on a circular tumulus that is within the estate" -do we know the archaeological team or archaeologist who did this?
 * added - it was J. Graham Callander, Scottish archaeologist.

Looks in really good shape, I await your response ♦ Dr. Blofeld  08:33, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for such a prompt and thorough review, . I think I've made all the adjustments if you get the chance to have another look, please?  SagaciousPhil   -  Chat  10:23, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Looks good for GA!♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:02, 4 August 2014 (UTC)