Talk:Form liner

RE: Reverting draft back to a prior version: I reverted the Form liner wiki back to an older version as it seemed that possible vandalism had taken place. Through this wiki, Scott System is trying to provide their expertise on form liners through posting pictures, links to pertinent articles and information on the subject matter. We are in no way trying to advertise or make the form liner wiki into a commercialized forum. We welcome Wiki editors to come in and take the time to add in their own pictures and expertise as opposed to deleting content that is substantiated through news articles and pictures. If there is some aspect of the Wiki that you feel should be deleted, please be courteous enough to give me a chance to respond via the discussion forum before making the deletion Evpope (talk) 20:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

RE: Reverting draft back to a prior version: I once again reverted the draft back to its prior version based on the changes made by drewdeering. I'd like to reiterate that Scott System is an expert resource on form liner, as substantiated through news articles and pictures, and are in no way trying to advertise or make the form liner wiki into a commercialized forum. We invite other editors (and other form liner experts from other companies) to add their expertise of content, pictures and articles to this wiki with substantiation.Evpope (talk) 19:36, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

RE: Reverting draft back to a prior version: Notice the page as it appears now. Notice no references to commercial formliner manufacturers, and notice no links to articles showcasing a single formliner manufacturer. Spewing Scott System references all over the page in every possible location is not considered "expert resources" nor is it helpful to anyone other than Scott System, who is obviously seeking additional media exposure. Get over yourself, this is not about you. If you were so innovative, you would have created the page in the first place, but it looks like you were beaten to the punch. I will continue to remove any contaminating Scott System references from this otherwise sterile article. Drewdeering (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

I apologize for any confusion. Although I am part of the Scott System marketing team (which I have been very transparent about), I was hoping this could be a forum that form liner experts (including Spec, Fitzgerald, Architectural Polymers and others) could get on and add their own expertise to give the public a better idea of what form liner is and how it works, while making sure to use pictures and articles to substantiate any claims. I'd like to be forward thinking on this, and will work on revising the article. Evpope (talk) 17:50, 23 September 2009 (UTC)