Talk:Former Supreme Court, Singapore

Sources belong here, not in external links or references, unless they are used as inline references- and photo gallery issues
Sources belong here, not in external links or references, unless they are used as inline references It's true! So many well-intended sources appear to be dumped in the External links sections as if it's a parking lot for them. Perhaps some editors are unfamiliar with the process; please leave me a note on my talk page and I'll be glad to discuss it. In addition, the use of galleries in articles are generally frowned upon. Images are meant to reflect and enhance the information in the text, so I have removed the galleries per WP:IG. Please do not take this personally. Let us work to expand the text and reference it! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 21:59, 2 May 2012 (UTC) These sources do not belong in External links. I have moved the link farm from there to this talk page where they do belong. Warning: I didn't check them over, so be careful in choosing any references here. Thank you!
 * National Heritage Board (2002), Singapore's 100 Historic Places, Archipelago Press, ISBN 981-4068-23-3
 * Norman Edwards, Peter Keys (1996), Singapore — A Guide to Buildings, Streets, Places, Times Books International, ISBN 981-204-781-6
 * History of Supreme Court
 * History of Supreme Court