Talk:Formula One Group

Length of commercial rights
The article only makes mention of the 1995 14-year extension taking us up to 2009. However this article states that it was extended in 2001 taking them up to 2111, having previously already had the rights until 2011. Anyone know when the 2009-2011 extension was secured? AlexJ (talk) 16:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * the 14-y-contract was signed in late 1995, but startet at 1997-01-01 (could not before, because of the running concorde agreement) and ended 2010-12-31. --Llankru (talk) 01:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:F1 logo.svg
The image Image:F1 logo.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --00:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Formula One Promotions and Administration
I've merged Formula One Promotions and Administration here, because all the other FOG articles have been merged here, and it became FOM anyways, which is here. 70.51.10.188 (talk) 07:39, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

I've removed the FOA wiki link under Bernies photo as it just redirects here now. --86.5.85.61 (talk) 09:42, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

The Arithmatic's not right
If we believe in this article, then Delta Copco is 90% owned by CVC, 70% owned by JPMC, and "rest" to Bernie. Can a company have 160% of its share...?-- Samuel di  Curtisi  di  Salvadori  01:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Sweeping curves device
The device shown before each F1 race has now changed. This, the sweeping curves image should either be updated or removed. Sk8er Boi (talk) 23:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Petara
Petara redirects to this article, but is not mentioned anywhere. It should be possible to mention it in the "group companies" or "related companies" section - there are sources that can be found mentioning the company and its place in the hierarchy although I don't know if they are still correct as they are from several years ago. Peter&#160;E.&#160;James (talk) 12:50, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Petara was one of many holding companies that did nothing more than help Bernie and Co dodge taxes (or whatever those banking types like to call it), and I think it has been wound up now anyway. There is nothing to include here because it did nothing by itself, unlike the actual operating companies like FOM. The redirect could probably be deleted. QueenCake (talk) 14:40, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Formula One Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003154716/http://fia.com/en-GB/the-fia/governance/Pages/wmsc.aspx to http://fia.com/en-GB/the-fia/governance/Pages/wmsc.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:39, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

List of World Feed productions - Update
Dear Wikipedians, questions about events that don't show on the list: 1 - Is it correct that the Monaco Grand Prix was never covered? 2 - Of the 2020 broadcasts, the following are not listed: 70th Anniversary Grand Prix, Eifel Grand Prix, Emilia Romagna Grand Prix, Portuguese Grand Prix, Sakhir Grand Prix, Styrian Grand Prix, Tuscan Grand Prix - I would assume that if not all of them, at least some must surely have been produced by world feed. Maybe someone has info and means to update the spreadsheet accordingly. Else, I think it could also be removed from the section altogether, with just the verbal description remaining. (Sorry for my bad English)--92.195.84.252 (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)