Talk:Fort Southerland/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 06:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

I'll take this one, comments to follow in next few days. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 06:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Sorry it took so long to come back to this, comments as follows.

Lead
 * Fort Southerland was included...: suggest breaking the lead here to better differentiate between the historic and modern era.
 * Done

Construction
 * They are generally referred to as forts: link forts?
 * Linked at the first mention of forts a bit earlier in the paragraph

Camden Expedition and modern history
 * If the sources support it, perhaps add a one-liner to the end of the 2nd paragraph noting that there was (presumably) no further action in the area during the war.
 * I'm fairly sure this is accurate, but haven't seen anything in the sources, or in a couple other things I've checked
 * The remains of three of the redoubts were obliterated: perhaps add to the start of the section something to the effect of "In the postwar period, the remains...}}}
 * Done
 * Redoubt A, also known as Fort Lookout: for clarity and greater specificity, suggest stating this is the fourth of the redoubts.
 * Clarified
 * Despite its original site south of the city, Camden's growth has expanded to the north and west sites of the site.: I am uncertain about the construction of this sentence, particularly the usage of "Despite". I think effectively you are saying the growth of the city to the north and west meant that Fort Southerland, being the southernmost of the original redoubts, is the best preserved.
 * Significantly reworked
 * Wow, I really misunderstood the original sentence. It is much clearer now. Zawed (talk) 09:43, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The first sentence of the 4th para is really long and convoluted, suggest breaking it up.
 * Done
 * Describing the destruction of the earthworks at Camden: suggest "Describing the destruction of much of the earthworks at Camden", presumably those of Fort Southerland haven't been destroyed.
 * Done

Other stuff Generally looks in order, just minor tweaks required. Zawed (talk) 03:18, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Sources look OK
 * I reviewed reference #3 (Mark K. Christ) against what it was cited for and found no issues there.
 * No dupe links
 * Image tag checks out OK
 * - All of these have been addressed. Hog Farm Talk 23:31, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * This looks good. I am passing as GA as I believe it meets the necessary criteria. Zawed (talk) 09:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)