Talk:Fort Steuben Bridge/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 17:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Going to review this over this week.&mdash; CycloneIsaac – E-Mail 17:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * You probably should tell the cost of the toll.
 * Good point, found cost in 1940.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * "Improvements to the bridge were made in 1956." What type of improvements?
 * Snippet I picked up doesn't say, all I could find was that improvements were made then!♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Ref 10 is cited improperly. See Cite press release.
 * It's not essential though is it, even citation templates aren't compulsory. Perhaps User:ChrisGualtieri could address that?♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Ref 5 is missing a few details. The Ohio Good Roads Federation wrote the book.
 * Publisher added, couldn't find any more details in google books.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * "appropriation bill for the Department of Transportation mentioned" Optional, you should change Department of Transportation -> United States Department of Transportation, so it would not be confused for ODOT.

Article's going on hold. Happy two-year anniversary of the demolition!&mdash; CycloneIsaac – E-Mail 03:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

United States Department of Transportation was linked anyway but I piped it. Should be OK now. All addressed I believe.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Other than that one citation (I'll fix it), the article looks fine, passing!&mdash; CycloneIsaac – E-Mail 23:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Dr. Blofeld and CycloneIsaac! Been really busy as of late with life, thanks for polishing it up some more. This article was something that I am not too major of a contributor, but I was asked to help work on it and I'm glad its a GA. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. If you can get this to GA, we might have a Good topic.&mdash; CycloneIsaac – E-Mail 02:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, let's start working on it. - Denimadept (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)