Talk:Fort Tryon Park/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 02:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Criteria
1. Well-written
 * Prose clear, concise, and understandable ✅ See some of the comments below
 * Spelling/Grammar ✅ I corrected a few minor issues as I went along.
 * Lead ✅
 * Layout ✅
 * Buzzwords/fiction/lists ✅

2. Verifiable
 * No original research ✅
 * List of references properly formatted ✅
 * Inline citations from RS ✅
 * No COPYVIO ✅ None detected.

3. Broad in coverage
 * Covers main aspects ✅
 * Stays on topic ✅, but see comment below at the public image section

4. Neutral ✅

5. Stable ✅

6. Illustrated if possible
 * Media tagged for copyright status ✅ Images all appear to be tagged as uploader's own work except for one, which is tagged as a donated image. There is no obvious reason to doubt the own work tags.
 * Media relevant ✅
 * I have one concern about the media. One of the images, the image of patrons on the lawn, shows a fairly close, high-enough resolution to be recognizable shot of a patron's face.  I'm not super familiar with the nuances of privacy law, but is this a situation in which the subject would have to give permission for the image to be released?  The person would not be trackable to get said permission, so somebody probably better look into the applicable privacy law with that.
 * I don't think this should be an issue, as it is not disallowed in Wikimedia Commons, but I'll look into replacing it. I took hundreds of pictures of the park a couple months ago. epicgenius (talk) 02:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * That ought to be good again. Since Commons doesn't disallow it, that'll work. Hog Farm (talk) 14:43, 13 January 2020 (UTC)