Talk:Fortunate Son (Hatfield book)

Alternate Media Report of Events
I've added the POV template because this section is not written neutrally. It is one thing to state an alternate point of view, but this section expresses it in factual terms. The reference to ' our third edition' also suggests this has been copied & pasted from a publisher's blurb. Ben Finn 14:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

This article absulotely needs to be removed. You are right this is a point of view book, however, an article published by the National Enquirer is being censored by Wikipedia, and it is a POV (allegation) article that President Obama had an affair durring the 2004 Sentorial campaign.

STOP THE OBVIOUS BIAS. You censor one you got to censor the other. Article or Book, irrelevant, both are allegations/rumor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.82.20.85 (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

This article needs a rewrite
The book is notable, even though the allegations are unsubstantiated. However, all of these allegations in the book are anonymous and unsubstantiated. Furthermore, weasel words are liberally used. An expunction, even if true which is highly suspect, is not a cover up. Lulaq (talk) 02:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)