Talk:Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies

More footnotes vs no footnotes
Hi :) you tagged this article as ``no footnotes`` but it looks like this tag should only be used for article with *no* footnotes, so did you mean to tag ``more footnotes`` (meaning there are some general references that are not used in inline citations, as is the case in this article)? [To clarify, this article does have some inline citations, but there are some general references that are currently unlinked from the inline citations, so those could do with being linked.] Asdfjrjjj (talk) 21:36, 2 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I not sure what went wrong there. Maybe because the refs aren't in the usual format. I've removed the tag. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Pointers
Possible pointers to improve article – Will prolly come back to do this soon / in future :) – Asdfjrjjj (talk) 02:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * add website infobox, as the terms 'FAMSI' and 'Foundation ... Studies, Inc' seem to be used both for the legal body and the website,
 * fix organisation infobox, as the legal body itself seems to now be 'held in stewardship' by LACMA (possibly a US steward-ownership sort of thing), despite Florida dissolution,
 * fix lead para to reflect above points more clearly / unambiguously,
 * add content from unlinked full refs, eg add a short history sec?