Talk:Foundation stone

Vague & Unreferenced
I'm the one responsible for the "expert" and "citation" requests, but I forgot to login. Sorry.

I think the lack of citations is pretty clear. I've noted in the article some of the easiest places to cite, but I have no idea how to verify this.

The history section is more problematic, because it is so vague: It references "ancient buildings" in "still more ancient times" without any specific mention of a region or time period, and makes extensive use of the passive voice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vectro (talk • contribs) 16:13, 31 August 2006

redundant
isnt this the same as the article Foundation Stone??????--Tresckow 03:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


 * ok its not really the same, but it cant be that the only difference in a Lemma is writing a letter capital or not. Maybe a disamb and more clear Lemmas like Foundation Stone (Dome of the Rock)--Tresckow 03:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


 * It's even easier than that. This is not such a complicated scenario as Trip the light fantastic; we can just link from one to the other, which I will do right now. Vectro 05:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)