Talk:Founding of Moldavia/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Samtar (talk · contribs) 10:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion
Please add any related discussion here.


 * Previous hold reason: "I've placed this article on hold for seven days to allow time for improvements. I note on the talk page there has been discussion, and recommend implementing some ideas from the sandbox. The primary point of failure of this article has been: 1a - "the prose is clear and concise"." <abbr title="Smiling face" style="border-bottom: none;">Face-smile.svg samtar { t } 13:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

, thank you for your thorough and bold review. I must apologize but I need more time to address all the issues above because I am quite busy in real life. Could you give me one more week (till 29 November)? Borsoka (talk) 15:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I can try, I don't think a bot will clear up after seven days. Also, as a side note, there seems to be a little bit of a content dispute going on? <abbr title="Smiling face" style="border-bottom: none;">Face-smile.svg samtar { t } 16:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I have moved material across from the sandbox, with the apparent endorsement of Borsoka (below). I'm hoping that interested editors will perform some cleanup before the deadline for the assessment. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 22:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅I believe that the material that I have incorporated both achieves conciseness and satisfies the requests regarding territorial description and origins of the Romanians. User:HopsonRoad 22:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Note that after the review, the name of the article should be changed to Founding of Moldavia, per discussion. User:HopsonRoad 22:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * , thank you for your hard work to improve the article. I highly appreciate your contribution., thank you for your bold review and understanding. I wish you both a beautiful week! I am planning to read the article again and to make some minor changes if I think it is necessary. Please feel free to modify my edits. Borsoka (talk) 14:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)