Talk:Founding of Wallachia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 14:28, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The article is reasonably well written and complies sufficiently with the manual of style.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Reference #66 appears to be an unreliable source.
 * ✅ (the unreliable source is deleted) Borsoka (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I assume good faith for all off-line sources.


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It appears both broad and focussed.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * File:Terratransalpina.png has no description or author information.
 * ✅ (the map is deleted; otherwise, it is an excellent map which does not contradict to the sources referred to in the article, but I am not in the position to fix it) Borsoka (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Terratransalpina.png has no description or author information.
 * ✅ (the map is deleted; otherwise, it is an excellent map which does not contradict to the sources referred to in the article, but I am not in the position to fix it) Borsoka (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just a few points to be addressed. On Hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:53, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for fixing those point. as you say, it is a pity about the map, but images do need sourcing information. I am haoppy to pass this as a Good Article.
 * OK, thanks for fixing those point. as you say, it is a pity about the map, but images do need sourcing information. I am haoppy to pass this as a Good Article.