Talk:Fractal-generating software

Untitled
Please do not reduce this article to a stub. It has useful information that is easily checked. In its restored form it embodies basic knowledge of fractal software that is shared by all people who use such software. An article on soap does not require a citation in support of the statement that many people use soap to wash.

If people have a concern about the article they can raise it here and allow a discussion to take place.Soler97 (talk) 20:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Even in the list form it's still a stub - in fact, technically it's more stubby in that form, since stubs are usually classified as such on the basis of their text ignoring any templates or lists. I agree, though, it makes more sense keeping the list of examples separate. The features, however, are another matter, and may well be better served by a paragraph. Grutness...wha?  22:27, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I agree that the article is not great, but that is no reason to make it worse. In its original form it was written in paragraphs but got reduced to points. I don't like articles written in point form and I had the impression that wikipedia discourages the practice, but this is how it ended up. You're welcome to redraft the features list as a paragraph but it will probably be reverted to list form.Soler97 (talk) 20:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I've had a go - hopefully it'll be acceptable to whoever keeps reverting it. I've added a bit of info from my partner (she works as a fractal artist and mathematician). Grutness...wha?  00:22, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

It looks OK to me. Let's see how it goes. Soler97 (talk) 05:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Seems to me the best way to treat features would be a table, but that would make an article with little prose even less readable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.188.164.248 (talk) 17:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Types
To be more comprehensive this page needs to identify more of the types of fractals generated as suggested at this |commons page. It should also explain these methods. - Shiftchange (talk) 10:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Fractal curves
The is nothing about the generation of fractal curves. All of these were produced with various methods, many of which aren't mentioned. I don't have the advanced understanding of mathematics required to comprehend how the various fractal types differ. This article would benefit from a mathematics pro to get to B class. - Shiftchange (talk) 06:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia article about "mandelbulber"
Hello Wikipedians,

is it recommended to create an extra article for "mandelbulber" or to integrate it into another article?

Regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 17:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)