Talk:Franatica Sorkočević

Requested move 13 November 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. Clearly there is not a consensus to re-title this article. I'll give it an AFD nomination after closing this discussion. Jenks24 (talk) 07:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Dživo Frana Sorkočević → Giovanni Francesco di Sorgo – "Giovanni Francesco di Sorgo" (9) vs. "Dživo Frana Sorkočević" (1), the latter being a fake book. Note that Sorkočević is a Croatian neologism of the official and original Ragusan name Sorgo. Z oupan 20:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)     --Relisted. Natg 19 (talk) 05:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I can barely find anything for "Giovanni Francesco di Sorgo" in a Google Books search. Why isn't this at WP:AFD for lack of notability? --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 17:19, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose This is turning disruptive. Zoupan is just posting numerous RMs all over the project for what he sees as quote "official" names, with nonsense GB stats (all in Italian, coincidentally). I have never gotten the same result as he has claimed to have seen.


 * Actual English-language hits are 1 for "Dživo Frana Sorkočević" (A Book of European Writers, Dr. Badal W. Kariye), and none for "Giovanni Francesco di Sorgo". The 9 hits Zoupan cites are all in Italian. There are no grounds for a move, and what's more, this doesn't meet WP:N (just like probably a great many Dubrovnik articles). -- Director  ( talk )  16:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * WP:DGAF and take to WP:AFD, per the above.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  03:11, 28 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

copy&paste + bad-faith search&replace
Compare User:Ragusino's last edit and http://hrcak.srce.hr/8338 It's depressing to see how Wikipedia was so crudely abused as a soapbox for pushing some fringe agenda. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 16:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)