Talk:Frances Parthenope Verney

This is such a good example of sloppy research. The Haigh article is not at that link. None of the information in this article can be verified through the ref list. The links to titles are very deceptive and give the impression that you can actually get those sources on the free internet. You cannot. Bostridge is a bonafide source, but page numbers should be cited when you are citing a book that is available only in print or an extremely overpriced ebook.--2603:6011:1D00:4150:5184:2E7:6ABC:1CC1 (talk) 15:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

You just make it worse with almost every revision
Okay, somebody removed Bostridge's source. Are you kidding me? You people really think you are making this thing BETTER? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6011:1D00:4150:C6F:7A1A:3EAB:1260 (talk) 21:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)