Talk:Francesco Totti/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:52, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Will make a start on this soon! JAG UAR   16:52, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Checking against the GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "In 2011, Totti was recognized by IFFHS as the most popular footballer in Europe" - recognised, if you want to stay consistent with the spelling
 * "In 2015, Totti's famous selfie celebration was included amongst the goal celebrations available for FIFA 16 and Pro Evolution Soccer 2016; he also took a selfie in the official trailer of the game on YouTube" - which game is this referring to?
 * "From a mental perspective, he displayed a greater responsibility for the team, and was presented with the number 10 jersey" - this sounds like his mental prowess was responsible for them presenting him with the number 10 shirt?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No original research found.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Ref 94, ref 93, ref 112, and ref 122 are all dead. Other than that, this article looks like the best one yet! The prose is excellent, comprehensive and engaging. I couldn't find anything major at all, so once all of those minor issues are out of the way this can pass. It took me a while to read all three of those articles today—I'm exhausted!  JAG  UAR   16:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Issues addressed. We cleaned it up a lot since the last review. Thanks a million! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for addressing them! This is an excellent article, so let's promote this  JAG  UAR   19:09, 23 November 2016 (UTC)