Talk:Francis Heylighen

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Worksection removed
Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed the worksection of this article for now. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 08:54, 10 October 2009 (UTC) P.S. I apologize for all inconvenience I have caused here, see also here. If you would like to assist in improving this article, please let me know. I can use all the help I can get. Thank you.

Connected contributor(s)
I suspect this because the contributor added a external link to the article's lead section. I have just warned the IP, in case the IP still represents the same person. Cheers, Unforgettableid (talk) 02:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Unforgettableid, I am sorry but I don't understand. If you have a problem with that external link, why don't correct it. Why add a CIO tag? -- Mdd (talk) 12:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Anyway I removed the link and the CIO template. -- Mdd (talk) 18:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Francis Heylighen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160123014504/http://www.worldacademy.org/view/general_listing to http://www.worldacademy.org/view/general_listing

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:06, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Unencyclopaedic Tone
May I suggest removing the second paragraph from the Work heading, in particular the line "Heylighen's scientific work covers an extremely wide range of subjects, exemplifying his intellectual curiosity and fundamentally transdisciplinary way of thinking." - this seems rather sycophantic and not in line with an encyclopaedic tone? Thanks, Swampycow (talk) 12:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)