Talk:Francis Kilcoyne

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this draft duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.nytimes.com/1985/01/21/nyregion/francis-kilcoyne-educator-is-dead.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SITH   (talk)   13:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I looked at it to understand what the problem is.

The first thing I notice is that Copyvio Detector, which is pointed to as a basis for saying it looks like there is a copyviolation, says "Violation Unlikely."

The second thing I notice is that when I go through even those few cases of the same words being used, many could not be copyviolations because they are names and such.

So, for example, "Kings Highway Hospital Center in Brooklyn."

And "Roman Catholic priest".

And "the Brooklyn Diocese at St. James Cathedral".

And "Lawrence, Massachusetts."

I do not think there is any way that those can be considered copyviolations.

Having made those statements, I will see what I can do to fix what you see as a problem.2604:2000:E010:1100:A995:2F3F:277B:C8C0 (talk) 03:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)