Talk:Francisco Tenamaztle

Only one reference
This article only has one reference, and it does not appear to be a very reliable one.Jarhed (talk) 07:27, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * no details on is fate?  typical wiki failure  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.38.155.134 (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2022 (UTC)


 * There are about 10 different references, so it is not a wiki failure. And the subject is notable. Smallchief (talk) 15:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Change of Name of Article
I propose to change the name of this article to 'Tenamaztle, Tenamaxtle" or "Francisco Tenamaztle." These seem the more commonly used names for the subject of the article.  Opinons?

Tenamaztle deserves much more recognition than an assessement of "low importance." I'll work on expanding and improving the article.
 * I welcome the work you are doing on this article. I agree that it deserves and needs attention. Please expand and improve before you make any major changes such as a move. I don't understand what you mean by your rename suggestions. The name of the article is Francisco Tenamaztle. Please sign your talk page entries.--Jarhed (talk) 01:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You're responding to an old message from an unknown person who apparently changed the name of the article. I did the recent expansion of the article.  I agree that this should not be a "low importance" article.  And I would prefer that the article be named Tenamaztle rather than "Francisco Tenamaztle."  But I dont feel strongly about it. Smallchief (talk) 01:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for setting me straight. Like I said, I appreciate your work. I will be watching and contributing if I can. As you get more done, let's consider a move and a reclassification, and if you can expand it 5x, perhaps a did you know. I also think this article is important and should be better known.Jarhed (talk) 20:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I think the current importance is fine - the life and story of Francisco Tenamaztle is incredibly interesting, but he is not really a very important figure and his biography has received surprisingly little attention. I also think the current title is fine using both his original and his Christian name - we do the same in articles like Carlos Ometochtli. Good work though!·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 20:22, 10 June 2011 (UTC)