Talk:Franco Donatoni

Fragmented
Stemming from a search for a citation for his teaching at Santa Cecilia, I run into the Grove entry on Donatoni. Skimming through it, I realized that a lot of information could be added to the WP article and that it currently contains only fragmented information.--Atavi (talk) 17:41, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Franco Donatoni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071028014708/http://www.musicaltimes.co.uk:80/archive/0004/donatoni.html to http://www.musicaltimes.co.uk/archive/0004/donatoni.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160110095214/http://jeffreylevinemusic.com:80/franco-donatoni-and-me/ to http://jeffreylevinemusic.com/franco-donatoni-and-me/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Infobox?
User:Revirvlkodlaku added an infobox to this composer article, contrary to the view presented at WikiProject_Composers. Infoboxes are neither required nor forbidden by Wikipedia policy, but the position stated there is that consensus should first be obtained from the editors of a classical-music composer article, before such a thing is added.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 07:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Support short and factual minimal infobox, which I, and see no problems. Compare Percy Grainger. I'd use infobox person, though. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose, especially as there is not much to encapsulate there and the article is in dire need of expansion (content expansion, not addition of further summaries of missing content). Toccata quarta (talk) 07:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)