Talk:Frank Brogan

Fair use rationale for Image:Brogan.jpg
Image:Brogan.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Neutrality
I'm very concerned about lack of neutral of this article. Some passages are like a cover letter for a job, particularly that part on Mr. Brogan's time as chancellor of the state university system in Florida. I'm new to Wikipedia and I hope I markig this in an appropriate manner. This man is involved in a major labor dispute in Pennsylvania and people deserve a neutral unbiased point of view in my humble opinion but that's just me I may be wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrawdaddyStinker (talk • contribs) 17:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Agreed. It reads like it was written by a PR agent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The South Shore (talk • contribs) 00:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

This is not a neutral article by even the lamest standards. It is a PR puff piece. It should not be on Wikipedia. It violates everything that a neutral source would stand for. Brogan is a politician using this puff piece to promote his career. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdeco (talk • contribs) 15:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

I am not a registered user, but I want to mention that his classification as an "American Academic" is inaccurate. Mr Brogan has not earned a terminal degree in any academic field, he has never taught at an academic institution, he has never published any scholarly research, and he has not contributed to any academic field. He has worked as a manager for some academic institutions, but working for an academic institution does not make one an academic. By this logic, the people who maintain the heating and a/c systems at a university are also academics. Before the article was converted to its current fluff piece, he was listed as an "American Politician". This or "American Academic Administrator" would be more accurate. 64.9.40.204 (talk) 23:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank Brogan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130820062224/http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/frank-brogan-leaves-florida-university-system-heads-pennsylvania to http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/frank-brogan-leaves-florida-university-system-heads-pennsylvania

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)